التظلم لدى وحدة المنازعات وفق قانون الشراء العام
Date
2024-01-28
Authors
شذى سعيد محمد ملحم
Shatha Saeed Mohammed Melhem
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
هدفت هذه الدراسة الى إلقاء الضوء على التظلم الإداري الذي يقدمه صاحب المصلحة إلى جهة الإدارة بوصفها سلطة عامة لغايات تحقيق المصلحة العامة، إلا انها قد تنحرف جهة الادارة عن ذلك وبناء عليه يتم إلغاء القرار الإداري غير المشروع أو سحبه، وتم تسليط الضوء من خلال هذا البحث على التظلم كإجراء ودي لإنهاء المنازعات الإدارية من قبل جهة الإدارة الأمر الذي يُجنب الشخص المتضرر بطء إجراءات التقاضي الإدارية ولذلك يهدف هذا البحث إلى دراسة التظلم الإداري كإجراء ودي لتسوية منازعات العقود الإدارية الذي بدوره قد يأخذ شكل الإجراء الإجباري أو الاختياري بحسب الجهة الإدارية المصدرة له بناء على النص القانوني الذي ينظمه، وألقت الدراسة الضوء حول التَظلُم الإدَاري مِن حيث الجِهة التي يُقدم إليهَا التظلُم من خلال الإشارة إلى جهة أخرى يُقدم التظلم اليها يطلق عليها التظلم إلى لجنة إدارية خاصة حيث انه وعند عدم انصاف المتضرر لديها يتم اللجوء إلى طريق التقاضي لتسوية منازعاته العقدية.
تناولت الدراسة إجراءات التظلم الإداري أمام وحدة مراجعة المنازعات المشكلة بموجب القرار بقانون رقم (8) لعام 2014م للشراء العام، والتطرق إلى تكوين هذه الوحدة واختصاصاتها وإجراءات التظلم أمامها.
وتناولت كيفية تشكيل وحدة لمراجعة النزاعات وذلك وفق نص المادة (57) من القرار بقانون رقم (8) لسنة 2014 بشأن الشراء العام،
وتناولت الواقع العملي للتظلم لدى وحدة مراجعة المنازعات من خلال عرض بعض الأمثلة المنشورة على بوابة الشراء العام
وتناولت هذه الدراسة منازعات العقود الإدارية من خلال بيان القرارات التي تصدر في العقود الإدارية وكيفية التظلم من هذه القرارات في مرحلة ابرام العقد الإداري لدى وحدة مراجعة المنازعات والتي تقبل الطعن بطريق الإلغاء وكذلك تم التطرق إلى القرارات الصادرة في مرحلة تنفيذ العقد والتي لا يكون للتظلم دور فيها حيث انها تتعلق بنصوص العقد ومخالفة نصوص العقد فيكون الاختصاص فيها للقضاء الشامل.
وقد خلصت الدراسة إلى بعض النتائج أهمها أن التظلم الإداري يعتبر إجراء لتسوية المنازعات الإدارية وهذا في ظل تراكم الدعاوى أمام القضاء الإداري ضد جهة الإدارة.
كما وانتهت الرسالة إلى بعض التوصيات من أهمها تفعيل دور لجنة مراجعة المنازعات بشكل أكبر وذلك من خلال النص على وجوب أن يكون التظلم لديها اجباري بموجب القانون لإنها تضم خبراء ذو خبرة وكفاءة مختصين للفصل في المنازعات المعروضة عليها قبل اللجوء إلى القضاء.
This study aims to highlight the administrative grievance submitted by an interested party to the administrative authority as a public entity with the goal of achieving public interest. However, the administrative authority may deviate from this objective, leading to the annulment or withdrawal of an unlawful administrative decision. The research emphasizes the grievance as an amicable procedure for resolving administrative disputes, which helps the aggrieved party avoid the slow administrative litigation process. The research seeks to examine the administrative grievance as an amicable method for settling administrative contract disputes. This procedure can be either mandatory or optional, depending on the issuing administrative authority and the governing legal text. The study also sheds light on the administrative grievance process in terms of the entity to which the grievance is submitted. It refers to another entity, known as the special administrative committee, to which a grievance can be submitted. If the aggrieved party does not receive justice from this committee, they can resort to litigation to resolve their contractual disputes. The study delves into the procedures for administrative grievances before the Dispute Review Unit established by Decree-Law No. (8) of 2014 on public procurement. It explores the composition of this unit, its competencies, and the grievance procedures before it. Furthermore, the study addresses the formation of the dispute review unit according to Article (57) of Decree-Law No. (8) of 2014 concerning public procurement. It examines the practical reality of grievances submitted to the Dispute Review Unit by presenting some examples published on the public procurement portal. The study also discusses administrative contract disputes by outlining the decisions made in administrative contracts and the process for appealing these decisions at the contract formation stage before the Dispute Review Unit, which accepts annulment appeals. It additionally addresses decisions made during the contract execution stage, where grievances do not play a role, as these decisions pertain to contract terms and violations thereof, falling under the jurisdiction of comprehensive judiciary. The study concludes with several findings, the most significant being that the administrative grievance is a procedure for resolving administrative disputes in light of the accumulation of lawsuits before the administrative judiciary against the administrative authority. The study also provides recommendations, the most important of which is to enhance the role of the Dispute Review Committee. It suggests mandating that grievances be submitted to this committee as a compulsory step by law, given that it comprises experts with the experience and competence needed to resolve disputes presented to them before resorting to the judiciary
This study aims to highlight the administrative grievance submitted by an interested party to the administrative authority as a public entity with the goal of achieving public interest. However, the administrative authority may deviate from this objective, leading to the annulment or withdrawal of an unlawful administrative decision. The research emphasizes the grievance as an amicable procedure for resolving administrative disputes, which helps the aggrieved party avoid the slow administrative litigation process. The research seeks to examine the administrative grievance as an amicable method for settling administrative contract disputes. This procedure can be either mandatory or optional, depending on the issuing administrative authority and the governing legal text. The study also sheds light on the administrative grievance process in terms of the entity to which the grievance is submitted. It refers to another entity, known as the special administrative committee, to which a grievance can be submitted. If the aggrieved party does not receive justice from this committee, they can resort to litigation to resolve their contractual disputes. The study delves into the procedures for administrative grievances before the Dispute Review Unit established by Decree-Law No. (8) of 2014 on public procurement. It explores the composition of this unit, its competencies, and the grievance procedures before it. Furthermore, the study addresses the formation of the dispute review unit according to Article (57) of Decree-Law No. (8) of 2014 concerning public procurement. It examines the practical reality of grievances submitted to the Dispute Review Unit by presenting some examples published on the public procurement portal. The study also discusses administrative contract disputes by outlining the decisions made in administrative contracts and the process for appealing these decisions at the contract formation stage before the Dispute Review Unit, which accepts annulment appeals. It additionally addresses decisions made during the contract execution stage, where grievances do not play a role, as these decisions pertain to contract terms and violations thereof, falling under the jurisdiction of comprehensive judiciary. The study concludes with several findings, the most significant being that the administrative grievance is a procedure for resolving administrative disputes in light of the accumulation of lawsuits before the administrative judiciary against the administrative authority. The study also provides recommendations, the most important of which is to enhance the role of the Dispute Review Committee. It suggests mandating that grievances be submitted to this committee as a compulsory step by law, given that it comprises experts with the experience and competence needed to resolve disputes presented to them before resorting to the judiciary
Description
Keywords
Citation
ملحم، شذى سعيد. (2024). التظلم لدى وحدة المنازعات وفق قانون الشراء العام [رسالة ماجستير منشورة،
جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع الرقمي لجامعة القدس. https://arab-scholars.com/85d02b