اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في القضاء وطرق الإثبات
Date
2025-01-12
Authors
ريم عودة عبد برغوثي
Reem Odeh Abed Barghouthi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
تتناول هذه الدراسة اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في القضاء وطرق الإثبات من كتابه " نظرية الدعوى بين الشريعة الإسلامية وقانون المرافعات المدنية والتجارية " وهو رسالتهُ في الدكتوراه والتي أُجيزت طباعتها بدون تعديل.
وتبدأ هذه الدراسة بنبذه عن حياة الشيخ محمد نعيم ياسين (رحمه الله تعالى) وذلك في فصل التمهيد وذلك ببيان اسمه ونسبه ونشأته، وشخصيته وصفاته، وأخلاقه، وحياته العلمية والعملية، والشيوخ الذين تأثر بهم في عصره، ومؤهلاته العلمية، وذكر مؤلفاته العلمية والتعريف بها والمناصب التي تقلدها في مسيرته العلمية، ثم وفاته.
ثم تناولت الدراسة في الفصل الأول منها ، اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين رحمه الله تعالى في القضاء وطرق الإثبات وجاءت على النحو التالي ، تعريف القضاء ، حكم طلب القضاء إن تعيّن على شخص معين، تعريف القضاء باعتباره صفة حُكمية أو فعل يقوم به القاضي، ثم كان له اختيار في التوفيق بين الأحاديث النبوية الواردة في ذم ومدح من يتولى القضاء. ثم اختياره في مفهوم الحق وعلاقة الدعوى به .
ثم اختياراته في باب الدعوى وهو الفصل الثاني من الرسالة ، حيث كان له اختيار في تعريف الدعوى اصطلاحاً ، وأطراف الدعوى ، وكان له اختيار في معايير التفريق بين أطراف الدعوى، وشرط معلومية المدعى به، ومسألة الإلزام بالدعوى ، ومسألة الدعوى بالدين المؤجل، والدعوى الاستفهامية وشرط الخلطة.
ثم جاء في الفصل الثالث من الرسالة اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في الآثار المترتبة على رفع الدعوى . حيث كان له اختيار في حدود أثر الحكم في الدعاوي القضائية ، واختيار في مسألة المساواة
ثم كان له اختيار (رحمه الله) في محاكمة الغائب ، والأعذار المبيحة لمحاكمة الغائب.
وقد جاءت اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين عن علم وفقه ومعرفة بقواعد الشرع والتي تعتمد على الدليل والحجة كما أن اختياراته رحمه الله جاءت لتيسر على الناس في عصرنا هذا لأنه وبعد كل اختيار كان (رحمه الله) يقول وأرى أن هذا أيسر ويتناسب مع مقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية في عصرنا هذا.
كما خرجت الدراسة بعدة نتائج من أهمها اختيار الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في تعريف مفهوم القضاء أنه صفة حكمية لأنها أدق من الفعل، وقد اختار في حكم من يتولى القضاء أن لا يطلبه الإنسان لنفسه لعظم المسؤولية.
وخرجت بعدة توصيات كان من أهمها متابعة طلبة العلم الشرعي ودراسة كافة اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في كل المجالات التي تحدث فيها ، وقد سبقتني زميلة من دفعتي في جامعتي وكتبت في اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في السياسة الشرعية ، وطالبة أخرى من الجامعة الأردنية كتبت عن اختياراته في الأحوال الشخصية ، ورسالتي هذه في اختياراته في القضاء وطرق الإثبات.
وأتمنى أن أرى علمهُ قد انتشر على يد طلبة العلم المعاصرين بإذن الله تعالى.
This study addresses the choices of Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin in the judiciary and methods of evidence from his book "The Theory of Lawsuits Between Islamic Sharia and Civil and Commercial Procedures" which is his doctoral thesis that was approved for publication without modification. The study begins with a brief biography of Sheikh Muhammad Na'im Yassin (may Allah have mercy on him), presented in the introductory chapter. This includes his full name, lineage, upbringing, personality, qualities, ethics, his academic and professional life, the scholars who influenced him in his time, his academic qualifications, his works, an introduction to them, and the positions he held during his scholarly career, as well as his death. The first chapter of the study then examines Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin's choices in the judiciary and methods of evidence, as follows: the definition of the judiciary, the ruling on a request for judiciary if it is assigned to a specific person, the definition of the judiciary as a judicial attribute or an action carried out by the judge, and his choice in reconciling the Prophetic Hadiths that criticize and praise those who assume judicial authority. The chapter also discusses his choice in the concept of "right" and its relation to lawsuits. The second chapter discusses his choices in the field of lawsuits. Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin’s choices include the definition of a lawsuit in terms of terminology, the parties to a lawsuit, his stance on the criteria for distinguishing between the parties to the lawsuit, the condition of knowing the claim, the issue of being compelled to file a lawsuit, the lawsuit regarding deferred debts, the investigative lawsuit, and the condition of mixing parties. The third chapter focuses on his choices regarding the consequences of filing a lawsuit. His choices include the limits of the effect of judgments in judicial cases, his choice regarding equality, and his stance on the trial of an absentee and the justifications for trying the absentee. Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin’s choices are based on knowledge, jurisprudence, and understanding of Sharia principles, which rely on evidence and reasoning. His choices also aim to make life easier for people in the modern era, as after each choice, he would say, "And I believe this is easier and more in line with the objectives of Islamic Sharia in our current time." The study concluded with several findings, including Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin’s choice to define the judiciary as a judicial attribute, as it is more accurate than defining it as an act. He also chose that no one should seek the judicial position for themselves due to the great responsibility it entails. The study also made several recommendations, with the most important being the need to encourage students of Islamic knowledge to study all of Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin's choices in the various fields he addressed. A colleague from my university had already written about his choices in political jurisprudence, while another student from the University of Jordan wrote about his choices in personal status law. My thesis focuses on his choices regarding the judiciary and methods of evidence. I hope that his knowledge will continue to spread through contemporary students of knowledge, God willing.
This study addresses the choices of Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin in the judiciary and methods of evidence from his book "The Theory of Lawsuits Between Islamic Sharia and Civil and Commercial Procedures" which is his doctoral thesis that was approved for publication without modification. The study begins with a brief biography of Sheikh Muhammad Na'im Yassin (may Allah have mercy on him), presented in the introductory chapter. This includes his full name, lineage, upbringing, personality, qualities, ethics, his academic and professional life, the scholars who influenced him in his time, his academic qualifications, his works, an introduction to them, and the positions he held during his scholarly career, as well as his death. The first chapter of the study then examines Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin's choices in the judiciary and methods of evidence, as follows: the definition of the judiciary, the ruling on a request for judiciary if it is assigned to a specific person, the definition of the judiciary as a judicial attribute or an action carried out by the judge, and his choice in reconciling the Prophetic Hadiths that criticize and praise those who assume judicial authority. The chapter also discusses his choice in the concept of "right" and its relation to lawsuits. The second chapter discusses his choices in the field of lawsuits. Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin’s choices include the definition of a lawsuit in terms of terminology, the parties to a lawsuit, his stance on the criteria for distinguishing between the parties to the lawsuit, the condition of knowing the claim, the issue of being compelled to file a lawsuit, the lawsuit regarding deferred debts, the investigative lawsuit, and the condition of mixing parties. The third chapter focuses on his choices regarding the consequences of filing a lawsuit. His choices include the limits of the effect of judgments in judicial cases, his choice regarding equality, and his stance on the trial of an absentee and the justifications for trying the absentee. Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin’s choices are based on knowledge, jurisprudence, and understanding of Sharia principles, which rely on evidence and reasoning. His choices also aim to make life easier for people in the modern era, as after each choice, he would say, "And I believe this is easier and more in line with the objectives of Islamic Sharia in our current time." The study concluded with several findings, including Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin’s choice to define the judiciary as a judicial attribute, as it is more accurate than defining it as an act. He also chose that no one should seek the judicial position for themselves due to the great responsibility it entails. The study also made several recommendations, with the most important being the need to encourage students of Islamic knowledge to study all of Dr. Muhammad Na'im Yassin's choices in the various fields he addressed. A colleague from my university had already written about his choices in political jurisprudence, while another student from the University of Jordan wrote about his choices in personal status law. My thesis focuses on his choices regarding the judiciary and methods of evidence. I hope that his knowledge will continue to spread through contemporary students of knowledge, God willing.
Description
Keywords
Citation
برغوثي، ريم عودة. (2025). اختيارات الدكتور محمد نعيم ياسين في القضاء وطرق الإثبات [رسالة ماجستير منشورة، جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع الرقمي لجامعة القدس.