تنفيذ حكم الالغاء
Date
2024-01-22
Authors
نداء احمد اسحق احمود
Nidaa Ahmad Ishaq Ehmoud
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
هدفت الدراسة إلى إلقاء الضوء على ظاهرة امتناع الادارة عن تنفيذ أحكام الالغاء من خلال التسليط على صور امتناع الادارة عن التنفيذ ودوافعها في ذلك، إضافة إلى آليات تنفيذ حكم الالغاء من خلال آليات مقررة على الادارة وآليات مقررة على الموظف المختص والممتنع عن التنفيذ.
ويدور منهج هذه الدراسة حول الكشف عن إشكالية امتناع الادارة عن تنفيذ حكم الالغاء بشكل وصفي تحليلي مقارن وذلك من خلال مقارنة التشريعات الفلسطينية بنظيراتها في التشريعات المقارنة (الفرنسي , المصري) , وبيان اوجه الاختلاف وطرق تنظيم تنفيذ أحكام الالغاء في هذه التشريعات , حيث تثور الاشكالية في هذه الدراسة حول الاطار القانوني الذي يحكم تنفيذ أحكام الالغاء والآليات القانونية لتنفيذها , وانتهاءً بوضع توصيات لتفعيل تنفيذ احكام الالغاء للحد من امتناع الادارة عن تنفيذ تلك الاحكام.
وقد تم تقسيم الدراسة الى فصلين: الاول بعنوان قواعد تنفيذ حكم الالغاء، وفي هذا الفصل تطرقت الى التزام الادارة بتنفيذ حكم الالغاء في (المبحث الاول)، وامتناع الادارة عن تنفيذ حكم الالغاء في (المبحث الثاني).
وفي الفصل الثاني من هذه الدراسة تناولت آليات مواجهة الامتناع عن تنفيذ حكم الالغاء، حيث قُسم هذا الفصل الى آليات مواجهة امتناع الادارة عن التنفيذ (المبحث الاول)، وآليات مواجهة امتناع الموظف المسؤول عن التنفيذ (المبحث الثاني).
وقد خلصت الدراسة الى بعض النتائج أهمها: قصور التشريعات الفلسطينية من خلال المقارنة مع التشريعات القانونية الاخرى وعلى الرغم من وجود آليات قانونية قررتها التشريعات الفلسطينية لدفع الادارة على تنفيذ أحكام الالغاء الا أنها لم تحقق الهدف المطلوب.
كما انتهت الدراسة الى بعض التوصيات من اهمها: تعديل القرار بقانون رقم 41 لسنة 2020 بإضافة نصوص صريحة تتعلق بتنفيذ أحكام الالغاء ورفع الحصانة عن الوزراء ومن في حكمهم حتى يسهل تحريك الشكوى الجزائية ضدهم حال امتناعهم عن تنفيذ أحكام الالغاء، اضافة الى ضرورة تطبيق الغرامة التهديدية في التشريع الفلسطيني لما في ذلك من إجبار للإدارة على تنفيذ تلك الاحكام.
The study aimed to highlight the phenomenon of the administrative refusal from implementing the revocation previsions by focusing on the instances of the administrative non-compliance from implementation and its pretexts, in addition to the mechanisms for implementing annulment ruling, through mechanisms established for those imposed on the administration and those imposed on the responsible employee who abstains from implementation. The methodology of this research revolves around revealing the problem of the administration’s refusal to implement the annulment ruling in a comparative, descriptive, analytical manner, by comparing Palestinian legislation with its counterparts in comparative legislations (French and Egyptian), It also highlights the differences and methods for regulating the implementation of annulment ruling in these legislations, The study addresses legal frameworks governing the implementation of annulment ruling and the legal mechanisms for their implementation, and concludes with recommendations to activate the implementation of annulment ruling, and to limit the administration’s reluctance to implement those provisions. The study was divided into two chapters: the first entitled "Administrative Commitment to Implementing Annulment Ruling," covering the rules for implementing annulment ruling (first section), and the administrative refusal to implement annulment ruling and its pretexts for doing so (second section). The second chapter explores mechanisms to confront the phenomenon of administrative non-compliance to implement annulment ruling, including mechanisms against the administration and mechanisms against the public employee responsible for implementation. The study concluded with several results, the most important of which are: the inadequacy of Palestinian legislation compared to other legal systems, and despite the existence of legal mechanisms established by Palestinian legislation to compel the administration to implement annulment ruling, they have not achieved the desired goal. The study also concluded with some recommendations, the most important of which are: amending Law No. 41 of 2020 by adding explicit provisions related to the implementation of annulment ruling. And lifting immunity from ministers and those in their jurisdiction, to facilitate filing criminal complaints against them in case they refrain from implementing annulment ruling. Additionally, there's an emphasis on applying the threatening fine in Palestinian legislation to compel the administration to implement annulment ruling.
The study aimed to highlight the phenomenon of the administrative refusal from implementing the revocation previsions by focusing on the instances of the administrative non-compliance from implementation and its pretexts, in addition to the mechanisms for implementing annulment ruling, through mechanisms established for those imposed on the administration and those imposed on the responsible employee who abstains from implementation. The methodology of this research revolves around revealing the problem of the administration’s refusal to implement the annulment ruling in a comparative, descriptive, analytical manner, by comparing Palestinian legislation with its counterparts in comparative legislations (French and Egyptian), It also highlights the differences and methods for regulating the implementation of annulment ruling in these legislations, The study addresses legal frameworks governing the implementation of annulment ruling and the legal mechanisms for their implementation, and concludes with recommendations to activate the implementation of annulment ruling, and to limit the administration’s reluctance to implement those provisions. The study was divided into two chapters: the first entitled "Administrative Commitment to Implementing Annulment Ruling," covering the rules for implementing annulment ruling (first section), and the administrative refusal to implement annulment ruling and its pretexts for doing so (second section). The second chapter explores mechanisms to confront the phenomenon of administrative non-compliance to implement annulment ruling, including mechanisms against the administration and mechanisms against the public employee responsible for implementation. The study concluded with several results, the most important of which are: the inadequacy of Palestinian legislation compared to other legal systems, and despite the existence of legal mechanisms established by Palestinian legislation to compel the administration to implement annulment ruling, they have not achieved the desired goal. The study also concluded with some recommendations, the most important of which are: amending Law No. 41 of 2020 by adding explicit provisions related to the implementation of annulment ruling. And lifting immunity from ministers and those in their jurisdiction, to facilitate filing criminal complaints against them in case they refrain from implementing annulment ruling. Additionally, there's an emphasis on applying the threatening fine in Palestinian legislation to compel the administration to implement annulment ruling.
Description
Keywords
Citation
احمود، نداء احمد. (2024). تنفيذ حكم الالغاء [رسالة ماجستير منشورة، جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع
الرقمي لجامعة القدس. https://arab-scholars.com/fb61a0