واقع إدارة المعرفة لدى مديري المدارس الحكومية في محافظة الخليل وعلاقتها بصنع القرار من وجهة نظر المعلمين
نسرين جميل مرشد إطميزة
Nesreen Jameel Murshed ltmaiza
The study aimed to identify the reality of knowledge management among government school principals in the Hebron Governorate and its relationship to decision-making from the teachers ’point of view, as well as to come up with a set of recommendations To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher used the descriptive analytical method, and the researcher chose a sample The study is according to the stratified random sampling method, as the study sample reached (650) male and female teachers from the Hebron Governorate schools. A questionnaire was prepared to measure knowledge management for school principals in the Hebron governorate from the teachers' point of view and it consists of (38) items distributed into five areas: (knowledge diagnosis, knowledge generation, knowledge storage, knowledge distribution, and knowledge application) and a questionnaire to measure decision-making consisting of (67) A paragraph distributed into six areas which are (identifying and diagnosing the problem, collecting data and information, determining the available alternatives and evaluating them, choosing the appropriate alternative, making the decision, and following up on the implementation of the decision). 1. The degree of practicing knowledge management processes of the school principal from the point of view of male and female teachers in the Hebron governorate was average in all fields, and the degree of practicing decision-making processes from the teachers ’viewpoint in the Hebron governorate was moderate in all fields. 2. There is a correlation between the sample averages of the sample’s estimate of the degree of practicing knowledge management processes and the averages of their estimates for the degree of decision-making processes among school principals from the teachers ’point of view in Hebron governorate schools. The correlation was strong and direct. 3. There are no differences between the estimates of the study sample individuals towards knowledge management processes due to variables: gender, academic qualification, years of experience, specialization, while there are differences in the two fields (knowledge generation and knowledge storage), in favor of the natural sciences specialization. 4. There are no differences between the estimates of the study sample individuals towards the degree of managers practice of decision-making processes due to variables: gender, specialization, years of experience, scientific qualification, while there are differences in the field of identifying and evaluating available alternatives, and in favor of those whose scientific qualification is MA or higher.