استقلال القضاء الدستوري وفقاً للنظام القانوني الفلسطيني
Date
2024-03-05
Authors
جاد ابراهيم صبحي إدريس
Jad ibrahim subhi idris
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
تحرص الدول على اختلاف انظمتها الدستورية على الاخذ بالقضاء الدستوري كجهاز مكلف لأعمال الرقابة القضائية، فنصت على ذلك في متون دساتيرها، حفظا لمكانته، وحماية لمركزه مقارنة مع السلطات.
وحتى يتمكن هذا الجهاز من القيام بالوظيفة المنوطة به بفعالية، كان لا بد من استقلاله عن السلطات ومختلف اجهزة الدولة، استنادا لاحاطة تشريعية، جاء التنصيص عليها في متون الدساتير والقوانين الناظمة للقضاء عموما، وللقضاء الدستوري على وجه الخصوص.
وبالنظر الى ما ورد من تنصيص عليه بشان القضاء الدستوري في مختلف الانظمة ومنها فلسطين، فان الملاحظ انها جاءت متفاوتة في تنظيمها له، سواء كان ذلك فيما يتعلق بالحقوق المقررة لقضاة المحاكم الدستورية التي تعزز استقلالهم، وتوفر الضمانات الكفيلة لاستقلالهم، وحمايتهم من المؤثرات سواء الخارجية او الداخلية، وكذلك الواجبات التي تضمن التزامهم بالقانون، وعدم الخروج عن النزاهة والحيدة الضامنة للعدالة.
States are keen to adopt constitutional justice as a body charged with judicial oversight, and have listened to this in the durability of their constitutions, in order to preserve its status, and to protect its status compared to the authorities. In order for this body to function effectively, it had to be independent of the authorities and various state organs, based on legislative briefing, which was provided for in the robustness of constitutions and laws governing the judiciary in general, and for constitutional justice in particular. In view of the provisions provided for on the constitutional judiciary in various regimes, including Palestine, it is noted that they have been uneven in their organization, whether with regard to the established rights of constitutional court judges that promote their independence, provide guarantees for their independence, protect them from external or internal influences, as well as duties that ensure their adherence to the law, and do not depart from the integrity and impartiality that guarantee justice.
States are keen to adopt constitutional justice as a body charged with judicial oversight, and have listened to this in the durability of their constitutions, in order to preserve its status, and to protect its status compared to the authorities. In order for this body to function effectively, it had to be independent of the authorities and various state organs, based on legislative briefing, which was provided for in the robustness of constitutions and laws governing the judiciary in general, and for constitutional justice in particular. In view of the provisions provided for on the constitutional judiciary in various regimes, including Palestine, it is noted that they have been uneven in their organization, whether with regard to the established rights of constitutional court judges that promote their independence, provide guarantees for their independence, protect them from external or internal influences, as well as duties that ensure their adherence to the law, and do not depart from the integrity and impartiality that guarantee justice.
Description
Keywords
Citation
إدريس، جاد ابراهيم. (2024). استقلال القضاء الدستوري وفقاً للنظام القانوني الفلسطيني [رسالة ماجستير
منشورة، جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع الرقمي لجامعة القدس. https://arab-scholars.com/bcbc9c