الإشكاليات الإجرائية للشهادة في المسائل الجزائية
Date
2023-05-28
Authors
أمير ماجد اسماعيل شيوخي
Ameer Majed Ismael Shyoukhi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
تم الحديث في هذه الدراسة عن الإشكاليات الإجرائية للشهادة في المسائل الجزائية فتم تقسيم هذا البحث إلى فصلين الفصل الأول منه يتحدث عن ماهية الشهادة في المسائل الجزائية فتم الحديث فيه عن مفهوم الشهادة في المسائل الجزائية وتم تعريف الشهادة فيمكن تعريف الشهادة على أنها قول يتوجب بمقتضاه على القاضي إصغاؤه والحكم بموجبه وإن عدل عائله مع تنوعه أو أقسم ملتمسه، لذا فهي إخبار من شخص حاضر في واقعة أو حدث بما علمه بلفظ مخصوص، ثم تم الحديث عن مصادر الشهادة في المسائل الجزائية، فمصادر الشهادة يمكن أن تأتي من المجني عليه أو المشتكي أو المدعي بالحق الشخصي كذلك المخبر عن الجريمة كذلك الامر الشهود الواردة ذكرهم في محضر التحقيق على لسان الشاهد أو المتهم أو المجني عليه كذلك الامر تم الحديث عن أنواع الشهادة في المسائل الجزائية والشروط التي يجب توافرها في الشاهد، فأنواع الشهادة في المسائل الجزائية هي الشهادة المباشرة، والشهادة على السماع، والشهادة الاستدلالية وتم الحديث في هذا المبحث عن الشروط التي يجب توافرها في الشاهد فالشروط التي يجب ان تتوافر في الشهاد هي الإرادة الحرة عند الإدلاء بالشهادة، والإدراك عند الشاهد، وأخلاقيات وحسن سلوك الشاهد.
أما الفصل الثاني فتم الحديث فيه عن ماهية الإشكاليات الإجرائية للشهادة في مرحلتي جمع الاستدلالات والتحقيق الابتدائي، فتم الحديث عن ماهية مرحلة جمع الاستدلالات ووسائل أدلة الإثبات، وأنواع القرائن فأنواع القرائن هي القضائية والقانونية ثم تم الحديث عن سلطات رجال الضبط القضائي، منها في الظروف العادية، ومنها في الظروف الاستثنائية، ثم تحدث الباحث عن ماهية الإشكالات الإجرائية للشهادة في المسائل الجزائية في مرحلة التحقيق الابتدائي، فتم الحديث عن سلطة التحقيق الابتدائي في مباشرة سماع الشهود و إجراءات سماع الشهود في مرحلة التحقيق الابتدائي وكذلك الامر الإشكاليات الإجرائية المتعلقة بتقدير ووزن قيمة الشهادة في المسائل الإجرائية. منها قاعدة حرية القاضي الجزائي في الاقتناع بالشهادة، أما المبحث الثاني فتم الحديث فيه عن ماهية الإشكاليات الإجرائية للشهادة في مرحلة التحقيق النهائي والآثار المترتبة عليها، وتم الحديث عن ضوابط الشهادة في مرحلة المحاكمة من إجراءات احضار الشهود وسماع شهادتهم، وامتناعهم عن الشهادة، ثم تحدث الباحث عن الشهادة الغير مباشرة، وموقف التشريعات المقارنة من الشهادة على السمع، وضوابط الاستثناء الواردة عليها.
In this study, the procedural problems of testimony in criminal matters were discussed, so this research was divided into two chapters. Listening to it and ruling according to it, even if its family is just with its diversity, or its petitioner swears, so it is a statement from a person present in an incident or an event of what he knew with a specific wording, then the sources of testimony were talked about in penal matters, so the sources of testimony can come from the victim, the complainant, or the claimant of the right The personal, as well as the informant of the crime, as well as the matter, the witnesses mentioned in the investigation report by the witness, the accused, or the victim. Likewise, the matter was discussed about the types of testimony in criminal matters and the conditions that must be met by the witness. The types of testimony in criminal matters are direct testimony, and hearing testimony, and evidentiary testimony. In this section, the conditions that must be met in the witness were discussed. The conditions that must be met in the testimony are the free will when giving testimony, the perception of the witness, and the ethics and good behavior of the witness. As for the second chapter, it talked about the nature of the procedural problems of testimony in the two phases of collecting inferences and the primary investigation, so it talked about what the phase of collecting inferences is, the means of evidence of proof, and the types of evidence. Including in exceptional circumstances, then the researcher talked about what are the procedural problems of testimony in criminal matters at the stage of the primary investigation, so the authority of the primary investigation was discussed in the direct hearing of witnesses and the procedures for hearing witnesses in the stage of primary investigation, as well as the procedural problems related to the assessment and weight of the value of the testimony in matters procedural. Among them is the rule of the criminal judge’s freedom to be convinced of testimony. As for the second topic, it talked about what the procedural problems of testimony in the stage of final investigation and its implications were, and the controls of testimony in the trial stage were talked about from the procedures for bringing witnesses, hearing their testimony, and their refusal to testify, then the researcher spoke On indirect testimony, and the position of comparative legislation on hearing testimony, and the exception controls contained therein
In this study, the procedural problems of testimony in criminal matters were discussed, so this research was divided into two chapters. Listening to it and ruling according to it, even if its family is just with its diversity, or its petitioner swears, so it is a statement from a person present in an incident or an event of what he knew with a specific wording, then the sources of testimony were talked about in penal matters, so the sources of testimony can come from the victim, the complainant, or the claimant of the right The personal, as well as the informant of the crime, as well as the matter, the witnesses mentioned in the investigation report by the witness, the accused, or the victim. Likewise, the matter was discussed about the types of testimony in criminal matters and the conditions that must be met by the witness. The types of testimony in criminal matters are direct testimony, and hearing testimony, and evidentiary testimony. In this section, the conditions that must be met in the witness were discussed. The conditions that must be met in the testimony are the free will when giving testimony, the perception of the witness, and the ethics and good behavior of the witness. As for the second chapter, it talked about the nature of the procedural problems of testimony in the two phases of collecting inferences and the primary investigation, so it talked about what the phase of collecting inferences is, the means of evidence of proof, and the types of evidence. Including in exceptional circumstances, then the researcher talked about what are the procedural problems of testimony in criminal matters at the stage of the primary investigation, so the authority of the primary investigation was discussed in the direct hearing of witnesses and the procedures for hearing witnesses in the stage of primary investigation, as well as the procedural problems related to the assessment and weight of the value of the testimony in matters procedural. Among them is the rule of the criminal judge’s freedom to be convinced of testimony. As for the second topic, it talked about what the procedural problems of testimony in the stage of final investigation and its implications were, and the controls of testimony in the trial stage were talked about from the procedures for bringing witnesses, hearing their testimony, and their refusal to testify, then the researcher spoke On indirect testimony, and the position of comparative legislation on hearing testimony, and the exception controls contained therein
Description
Keywords
Citation
شيوخي، أمير ماجد. (2023). الإشكاليات الإجرائية للشهادة في المسائل الجزائية [رسالة ماجستير منشورة،
جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع الرقمي لجامعة القدس. https://arab-scholars.com/9ac251