• English
    • العربية
  • English 
    • English
    • العربية
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • AQU Research Network Clusters
  • AQU researchers publications
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • AQU Research Network Clusters
  • AQU researchers publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Accuracy of Intracavitary Applicator Reconstruction for Cervix Cancer Brachytherapy

Thumbnail
View/Open
10.1007_s42399-019-00204-z.pdf (3.045Mb)
Date
2019-12-03
Author
ALMasri, Hussein
Kakinohana, Yasumasa
Toita, Takafumi
Ariga, Takuro
Kasuya, Goro
Murayama, Sadayuki
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The accuracy of intracavitary applicator reconstruction for cervical cancer was assessed. A homemade phantom that mimics clinical applicator placement and reference points was used. Three stainless steel (15°, 30°, and 45°) tandems, x-ray markers, and three reference points were used to compare radiography- and CT-based systems. For CT reconstructions, two Fletcher CT compatible (15° and 30°) tandems, two ovoids, and two reference points, with and without inserted x-ray markers, were used. A 2.5-mm CT slice thickness was used. To check for inter- and intra-operator variations in CT, only a 30° tandem without x-ray markers and 1.25-mm CT slice thickness were used. Applicators were reconstructed three times for each image set to verify the operator reproducibility. A 6 Gy dose was prescribed and normalized at AL-point. Source dwell times were compared to check for dose variation at A-point. Maximum standard deviations SD (σ) for radiography and CT reconstructions were 0.35 and 0.83mm, respectively. Analysis of variance for the means of 15° and 30° tandems showed no significant difference. Levene’s test proved insignificant difference for 15° tandem (p value = 0.131), whereas it showed a significant difference for 30° tandem (p value = 0.011). This phantom study showed that the variance of dwell times between the two methods for 30° tandem was statistically significant due to increased applicator curvature. CT proves superiority to radiography. X-ray marker method was more accurate but has less image quality. Inter- and intra-oncologist variations showed good agreement.
URI
https://dspace.alquds.edu/handle/20.500.12213/5033
Collections
  • AQU researchers publications [753]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV