عبء الإثبات في الدعوى العمومية دراسة مقارنة
| dc.contributor.author | مي عبد الرحمن رمزي | AR |
| dc.contributor.author | Mai Abdel Rahman Ramzi | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-23T09:02:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-23T09:02:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-01-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examined the subject of proof in public proceedings, which is one of the important results of the principle of presumption of innocence that assumes every citizen of arms since the start of the public proceedings until its completion in a sense placing the burden on the authority of that case and the indictment of entrusted power to move and in accordance with procedures to ensure respect for the rights of the accused who are supposed to provide evidence of their innocence, the evidence of claims other than the contrary, rests with the authority to indict the burden of proving all the elements of the crime and its elements as well as validate Assigned to the accused and then study the role of prosecutors in proving lack of expiry of public proceedings and it's still vibrant so you can proceed with their investigation. The study was presented as an exception to the supposed origin and kinds of evidence and the extent of the impact in shifting the burden of proof of authority to indict the accused and the accused into power sometimes charge under review the practice of prosecutorial practices on burden of proof. The study aimed to develop a clear vision of the role of public prosecution in divesting the burden of proof in criminal procedure law, compared with what took him all of the Jordanian Code of criminal procedure on the one hand, and the Egyptian Code of criminal procedure. The study adopted the descriptive analytical approach and integrated comparison curriculum and it found a set of results the most important was the deficiency of the role of public prosecution to bear the burden of proving the case in Palestine. The study found that the provisions of the Act not apply accusation authority fully this demonstrates a lack of understanding of the prosecutors of the concept of the presumption of innocence, and lack of logistics to them to promote their role to the fullest of his books, and the number of members, in addition to the lack of possibilities for judicial officers, not to implement many of the memos that cause delay for wasting the community right and punish the culprits. At the end, the study recommended the enactment of a whole chapter on criminal evidence and procedure, the preliminary inquiry stage, entrusting the charge complete divesting in criminal evidence. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | رمزي، مي عبد الرحمن. (2017). عبء الإثبات في الدعوى العمومية دراسة مقارنة [رسالة ماجستير منشورة، جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع الرقمي لجامعة القدس. | ar |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.alquds.edu/handle/20.500.12213/9888 | |
| dc.language.iso | ar | |
| dc.publisher | Al-Quds University | en |
| dc.title | عبء الإثبات في الدعوى العمومية دراسة مقارنة | ar |
| dc.title | The Burden of Proof in Public lawsuit (Comparative Study) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis |