تنحي القضاة وردهم في الدعوى الجزائية
Date
2024-02-01
Authors
منار زهير اسماعيل شلالدة
Manar zouhair ismael shalalda
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
تهدف الباحثة من خلال هذه الدراسة الى بيان مفهوم رد القضاة وتنحيهم في الدعوى الجزائية وبحث النصوص القانونية الناظمة لهذه المسألة وبحث مدرى كفايتها ومعالجة أوجه القصور فيما يتعلق بتنظيم أحكام رد القضاة وتنحيهم في الدعوى الجزائية، بالإضافة الى بيان حالات وأسباب رد القضاة وتنحيهم، وبيان الإجراءات الواجبة الاتباع في تقديم طلب رد القضاة وتحديد الجهة التي قدم اليها الطلب، بالإضافة الى التعرف الى أثر الحكم الصادر في طلب الرد والتنحي على الدعوى الجزائية، وتقديم التوصيات اللازمة بشأن موضوع الدراسة.
واعتمدت هذه الدراسة على المنهج الوصفي من خلال عرض النصوص القانونية ووصفها وجمع المعلومات والبيانات عنها واستخراج الآراء القانونية الفقهية المختلفة المرتبطة بموضوع الدراسة، بالإضافة الى المنهج التحليلي من خلال دراسة وتحليل النصوص القانونية المرتبطة بمسألة رد القضاة وتنحيهم في الدعوى الجزائية من خلال تحليل ما ورد في قانون الإجراءات الجزائية رقم (3) لسنة 2001م وعدد من القوانين المقارنة ايضاً، الى جانب المنهج المقارن من خلال مقارنة النصوص القانونية التي تناولت موضوع رد القضاة وتنحيهم في الدعوى الجزائية وبين عدة قوانين بغية الاستفادة من التجارب المختلفة كلما دعت الحاجة الى ذلك، وتوصت الدراسة الى:
1. الدمج بين السلطات الخاصة بالقضاء المتعدد يعمل على ضعف خبرات القضاة، كما يضعف من مقدرته على الحكم بالعدل.
2. تعتبر الأخطاء الموضوعية موحدة في كافة الأحكام القضائية والتي تنتج من تعارض الأعمال القضائية والتي تصدر من جهات غير مختصة مع الأعمال التي تدور في نطاق اختصاصها.
3. تعد الأسباب الخاصة بالرد موحدة في كافة الدعاوي المدنية منها والجزائية.
4. تختلف دوافع التنحي من قاضي لآخر ومن ثم يتم تنحي القاضي عن نظر الدعوى وفقا لما يشعر به من حرج.
5. اعتماد التشريعات الجزائية الغربية للعديد من الطرق والوسائل التي تساهم في سرعة الفصل في الدعوى الجزائية والعمل على التقليل من القضايا الجزائية التي يتم عرضها أمام المحاكم الجزائية.
Through this study, the researcher aims to explain the concept of judges’ recusal and recusal in criminal cases, examine the legal texts regulating this issue, examine their adequacy, and address deficiencies with regard to regulating the provisions of judges’ recusal and recusal in criminal cases, in addition to explaining the cases and reasons for judges’ recusal and recusal, and explaining the due procedures. Follow the procedures for submitting a request to recusal judges and specify the body to which the request was submitted, in addition to identifying the impact of the ruling issued in the request for recusal and recusal on the criminal case, and providing the necessary recommendations regarding the subject of the study. This study relied on the descriptive approach by presenting and describing legal texts, collecting information and data about them, and extracting various jurisprudential legal opinions related to the subject of the study, in addition to the analytical approach by studying and analyzing legal texts related to the issue of judges’ dismissal and recusal in criminal cases by analyzing what was stated in the law. Criminal Procedures No. (3) of 2001 AD and a number of comparative laws as well, in addition to the comparative approach by comparing the legal texts that dealt with the issue of judges’ dismissal and recusal in criminal cases, and between several laws in order to benefit from different experiences whenever the need arises. 1. The merging of the powers of the multiple judiciaries weakens the judges’ expertise and weakens their ability to rule fairly. 2. Substantive errors are considered uniform in all judicial rulings, which result from the conflict of judicial actions issued by non-competent parties with actions that take place within the scope of their jurisdiction. 3. The reasons for dismissal are uniform in all civil and criminal lawsuits. 4. The motives for stepping down differ from one judge to another, and then the judge whithdarws from hearing the case according to the embarrassment he feels. 5. Western criminal legislation adopts many methods and means that contribute to speeding up the adjudication of criminal cases and working to reduce the criminal cases that are brought before the criminal courts.
Through this study, the researcher aims to explain the concept of judges’ recusal and recusal in criminal cases, examine the legal texts regulating this issue, examine their adequacy, and address deficiencies with regard to regulating the provisions of judges’ recusal and recusal in criminal cases, in addition to explaining the cases and reasons for judges’ recusal and recusal, and explaining the due procedures. Follow the procedures for submitting a request to recusal judges and specify the body to which the request was submitted, in addition to identifying the impact of the ruling issued in the request for recusal and recusal on the criminal case, and providing the necessary recommendations regarding the subject of the study. This study relied on the descriptive approach by presenting and describing legal texts, collecting information and data about them, and extracting various jurisprudential legal opinions related to the subject of the study, in addition to the analytical approach by studying and analyzing legal texts related to the issue of judges’ dismissal and recusal in criminal cases by analyzing what was stated in the law. Criminal Procedures No. (3) of 2001 AD and a number of comparative laws as well, in addition to the comparative approach by comparing the legal texts that dealt with the issue of judges’ dismissal and recusal in criminal cases, and between several laws in order to benefit from different experiences whenever the need arises. 1. The merging of the powers of the multiple judiciaries weakens the judges’ expertise and weakens their ability to rule fairly. 2. Substantive errors are considered uniform in all judicial rulings, which result from the conflict of judicial actions issued by non-competent parties with actions that take place within the scope of their jurisdiction. 3. The reasons for dismissal are uniform in all civil and criminal lawsuits. 4. The motives for stepping down differ from one judge to another, and then the judge whithdarws from hearing the case according to the embarrassment he feels. 5. Western criminal legislation adopts many methods and means that contribute to speeding up the adjudication of criminal cases and working to reduce the criminal cases that are brought before the criminal courts.
Description
Keywords
Citation
شلالدة، منار زهير. (2024). تنحي القضاة وردهم في الدعوى الجزائية [رسالة ماجستير منشورة، جامعة القدس، فلسطين]. المستودع الرقمي لجامعة القدس.