الرواة الذين خالف الذهبي في كتابه "ميزان الاعتدال" ابن عدي في كتابه "الكامل في ضعفاء الرجال
| creativework.keywords | الرواة ,الذهبي ,ميزان الاعتدال | ar |
| dc.contributor.author | مي محمد خليل البطاط | ar |
| dc.contributor.author | Mai Mohammed Khalil Al Battat | ar |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T10:00:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T10:00:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-01-19 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This Study aims to show the different between "Ibn Udday", who is one of the applicants in the narrators status, validating and Ta'deel in PropheticTradition, and "Al-Dhahabi" who is one of the late in it through the book of "Meezan Al-E'tedal " . To achieve the study objectives, followed the inductive and the descriptive and critical approach, where the researcher keeps track of the narrators different in them between " Ibn Udday " and " Aldhahabi " in "Meezan Al-E'tedal " in the Prophrtic Tradition and manifest the difference between them in the same narrator, and then describe this difference and clarify them and comparison between the views, and the statement of opinion likely based on the views of scientists of " Al-Jarh and Ta'deel" . After looking at the book of " Meezan Al-E'tedal " , the researcher limited the number of the narrators who differed between " Ibn Udday " and " Aldhahabi ", so ,I mentioned the narrator with a simple translation of it, and then " Ibn Udday " and " Al-Dhahabi " saw the narrator as "Jarh and Ta'deel" ,and I touched on the opinions of the scholars of " Al-Jarh and Al-Ta'deel in the same narrator ponerant opinion from these opinions. The researcher divided this thesis into an introduction, three chapters and conclusion:- As for the first chapter, it revolves around the definition of " Ibn Udday" and " Al-Dhahabi ", the definition of each book and the coparison between them. As for the second chapter : it centered on the study of the narrators who differed between them; between " Al-Dhahabi " and " Ibn Udday " in "Meezan Al-E'tedal" , and the number of different narrators in this chapter was forty-three narrators, the researcher mentioned the narrator, and a simple translation for him and who narrated for him from the six authers, and the opinion of the other critics and the pnderant of these opinions and they were arranged according to the letters of the dictionary. And the talk the third chapter was about the narrators, whom " Ibn Al-Dhahabi " disagreed with, and " Al-Dhahabi " said about : the first was not mentioning them in the book of " Al-Kamel " because they are among the trustworthy who should not be mentioned in the books of " The Weak ", and their number was twenty-five narrators, and they were arranged according to the letters of the dictionary [ in Alphabetical order]. Then the conclusion, which the researcher included, is the summary of her findings, and most important recommendation. Then, the researcher appended this study with set of technical indexes arranged according to the methodology of scientific research and its origions. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.alquds.edu/handle/20.500.12213/7790 | |
| dc.language.iso | ar | |
| dc.publisher | Al-Quds University | en |
| dc.title | الرواة الذين خالف الذهبي في كتابه "ميزان الاعتدال" ابن عدي في كتابه "الكامل في ضعفاء الرجال | ar |
| dc.title | The narrators who disagreed with al-Dhahabi in his book "Meezan Al-E'tedal " Ibn Uday in his book "Al-Kamel in Weak Men." | en |
| dc.type | Thesis |