إجراءات القضاء المستعجل وطرق الطعن فيها
Date
2023-09-02
Authors
احمد عوني عبد الرحمن البربراوي
Ahmad awni abdalrahman albarbarawi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Al-Quds University
Abstract
تتناول هذه الدراسة أحكام القضاء المستعجل في قانون أصول المحاكمات المدنية، والتجارية الفلسطيني رقم 2 لسنة (2001) مقارنة بالتشريعات المصرية والأردنية في محاولة للتوصل إلى بعض النتائج التي يمكن أن نستفيد بها في صقل هذا النوع من أنواع التقاضي الذي تزايد اللجوء إليه في الحياة العملية، نظرًا إلى التطور الهائل والسريع الذي شمل مناحي الحياة كافة، وما استتبع ذلك من تزايد لدور القضاء المستعجل، حيث أصبح من اللازم أن تتطور النظم القضائية وبما يحقق سرعة حل الخلافات بين الأفراد، الأمر الذي يتطلب تطوير وظيفة القضاء المستعجل بما يخدم العدالة.
وبناءً على ما سبق؛ جاءت هذه الدراسة لتوضح اجراءات القضاء المستعجل، وطرق الطعن فيها، وذلك من خلال بحث مفهوم القضاء المستعجل، وصوره أهميته، وضروراته، ومميزاته، وشروطه، وأهم اختصاصات قاضي الأمور المستعجلة، واهم إجراءات القضاء المستعجل، وطرق الطعن في هذا النوع من الأحكام.
ولتحقيق الأهداف السابقة استخدم الباحث المنهج التحليليّ بشقيّه (الاستقرائي، والاستنباطي)، والمنهج المقارن لتحقيق الأهداف المرجوة من هذه الدراسة، وذلك بتقسيمها إلى فصلين: تحدثت في الفصل الأول عن ماهية القضاء المستعجل، واختصاص قاضي الأمور المستعجلة. أما الفصل الثاني فقد تمّ الحديث فيه عن الأحكام القانونية للقضاء المستعجل، وطرق الطعن فيها.
وختامًا توصل الباحث إلى مجموعة من النتائج، أهمها: أوجد القضاء المستعجل علاجًا لمشكلة تراكم القضايا، وذلك للتخفيف من الوقت، والجهد، والنفقات، ويؤدي الى حماية عاجلة ومؤقته ولوقف المماطلة والتسويف الذي قد يلجأ إليها الخصم سيّئ النيّة، فهو إجراء يتسم بالبساطة والاقتصاد في المواعيد. وكذلك فإن المشرّع الفلسطيني وضع قواعد شاملة للطلبات المستعجلة، وترك فيها الأمر لسلطة القاضي التقديرية، والظروف المحيطة فيما إذا كان الأمر من ضمن المسائل المستعجلة التي يخشى عليها من فوات الوقت. أيضًا حتى يتم قبول الدعوى الاستعجالية لا بدّ من التثبت من شروط اختصاص القضاء المستعجل أولًا، ومن ثمّ البحث في شروط قبول دعوى الاستعجال، وبالتالي فإنّ بحث القاضي في شروط قبول الدعوى الاستعجالية -خاصة شرط الصفة، والمصلحة- يعدّ بمثابة البحث في ظاهر أدلة أصل الحقّ.
وبناءً على ما سبق أوصى الباحث بمجموعة من التوصيات، أهمها: تعديل نصّ المادة (205) فقرة (2) من قانون أصول المحاكمات المدنية والتجارية الفلسطيني رقم (2) لسنة (2001) بحيث يتم تقصير مدة استئناف الأحكام الصادرة عن قاضي الأمور المستعجلة في الطلبات المستعجلة بحيث تصبح كالتالي: -"تكون مدة الطعن عشرة أيام في الأحكام الصادرة عن قاضي الأمور المستعجلة، والقرارات القابلة للطعن، بموجب أحكام المادة (192). وكذلك يوصي الباحث بأن يقوم المشرّع الفلسطيني بتوريد نصوص خاصّة ينظم فيها تنفيذ الأحكام الصادرة عن قاضي الأمور المستعجلة، وعدم اخضاع تنفيذ الأحكام الصادرة في الأمور المستعجلة للقواعد العامة لأن ذلك يتعارض مع الغرض الذي أنشئ القضاء المستعجل لأجله.
This study deals with the provisions of summary judgment in the Palestinian Civil and Commercial Procedure Code No. 2 of 2001, compared to Egyptian and Jordanian legislation, in an attempt to reach some results that we can benefit from in refining this type of litigation, which has been increasingly resorted to in practical life. In view of the tremendous and rapid development that has included all aspects of life, and the consequent increase in the role of the urgent judiciary, it has become necessary for judicial systems to develop in a way that achieves rapid resolution of disputes between individuals, which requires developing the function of the urgent judiciary in a way that serves justice. Based on the above; This study came to clarify the procedures of the urgent judiciary, and the methods of appealing them, through examining the concept of the urgent judiciary, its importance, its necessities, its features, its conditions, the most important powers of the judge of urgent matters, the most important procedures of the urgent judiciary, and the methods of appealing this type of rulings. To achieve the previous objectives, the researcher used the analytical method in both parts (inductive and deductive), and the comparative method to achieve the desired goals of this study, by dividing it into two chapters: In the first chapter, I talked about the nature of urgent judiciary, and the jurisdiction of the judge of urgent matters. The second chapter discusses the legal rulings of the urgent judiciary and ways to appeal them. In conclusion, the researcher reached a set of results, the most important of which are: The urgent judiciary created a solution to the problem of the accumulation of cases, in order to reduce time, effort, and expenses, and lead to urgent and temporary protection and to stop the procrastination and procrastination that an ill-intentioned opponent may resort to, as it is a procedure characterized by simplicity and economy in timing. . Likewise, the Palestinian legislator established comprehensive rules for urgent requests, leaving the matter to the discretionary authority of the judge and the surrounding circumstances as to whether the matter is among the urgent matters for which there is a fear that time will be lost. Also, in order for the urgent lawsuit to be accepted, it is necessary to verify the conditions for the jurisdiction of the urgent judiciary first, and then research the conditions for accepting the urgent lawsuit. Therefore, the judge’s research into the conditions for accepting the urgent lawsuit - especially the condition of capacity and interest - is considered an investigation into the apparent evidence of the origin of the right. Based on the above, the researcher recommended a set of recommendations, the most important of which is: Amending the text of Article (205) Paragraph (2) of the Palestinian Civil and Commercial Procedures Law No. (2) of (2001) so that the period for appealing judgments issued by the judge of urgent matters in requests is shortened. urgent matters, so that it becomes as follows: - “The appeal period shall be ten days in the rulings issued by the urgent matters judge, and the decisions subject to appeal, in accordance with the provisions of Article (192). The researcher also recommends that the Palestinian legislator provide special texts regulating the implementation of the rulings issued by the urgent matters judge.” And not subjecting the implementation of rulings issued in urgent matters to general rules because that conflicts with the purpose for which the urgent judiciary was established.
This study deals with the provisions of summary judgment in the Palestinian Civil and Commercial Procedure Code No. 2 of 2001, compared to Egyptian and Jordanian legislation, in an attempt to reach some results that we can benefit from in refining this type of litigation, which has been increasingly resorted to in practical life. In view of the tremendous and rapid development that has included all aspects of life, and the consequent increase in the role of the urgent judiciary, it has become necessary for judicial systems to develop in a way that achieves rapid resolution of disputes between individuals, which requires developing the function of the urgent judiciary in a way that serves justice. Based on the above; This study came to clarify the procedures of the urgent judiciary, and the methods of appealing them, through examining the concept of the urgent judiciary, its importance, its necessities, its features, its conditions, the most important powers of the judge of urgent matters, the most important procedures of the urgent judiciary, and the methods of appealing this type of rulings. To achieve the previous objectives, the researcher used the analytical method in both parts (inductive and deductive), and the comparative method to achieve the desired goals of this study, by dividing it into two chapters: In the first chapter, I talked about the nature of urgent judiciary, and the jurisdiction of the judge of urgent matters. The second chapter discusses the legal rulings of the urgent judiciary and ways to appeal them. In conclusion, the researcher reached a set of results, the most important of which are: The urgent judiciary created a solution to the problem of the accumulation of cases, in order to reduce time, effort, and expenses, and lead to urgent and temporary protection and to stop the procrastination and procrastination that an ill-intentioned opponent may resort to, as it is a procedure characterized by simplicity and economy in timing. . Likewise, the Palestinian legislator established comprehensive rules for urgent requests, leaving the matter to the discretionary authority of the judge and the surrounding circumstances as to whether the matter is among the urgent matters for which there is a fear that time will be lost. Also, in order for the urgent lawsuit to be accepted, it is necessary to verify the conditions for the jurisdiction of the urgent judiciary first, and then research the conditions for accepting the urgent lawsuit. Therefore, the judge’s research into the conditions for accepting the urgent lawsuit - especially the condition of capacity and interest - is considered an investigation into the apparent evidence of the origin of the right. Based on the above, the researcher recommended a set of recommendations, the most important of which is: Amending the text of Article (205) Paragraph (2) of the Palestinian Civil and Commercial Procedures Law No. (2) of (2001) so that the period for appealing judgments issued by the judge of urgent matters in requests is shortened. urgent matters, so that it becomes as follows: - “The appeal period shall be ten days in the rulings issued by the urgent matters judge, and the decisions subject to appeal, in accordance with the provisions of Article (192). The researcher also recommends that the Palestinian legislator provide special texts regulating the implementation of the rulings issued by the urgent matters judge.” And not subjecting the implementation of rulings issued in urgent matters to general rules because that conflicts with the purpose for which the urgent judiciary was established.